Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 6 series 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 143 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 280 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 6 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 6 sērija 2011 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2011 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 71 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 460 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 168 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |