Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 1 series 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 146 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 150 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2011 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
| Audi TT is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 370 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 78 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |