Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 1 series 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 1 series, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW 1 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 370 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 78 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |