Audi TT 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 168 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 10.9 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 65 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Audi TT has 72 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |