Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
Audi TT is 39 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 440 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 148 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`810 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |