Audi TT 2014 vs Ford Mustang 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 230 HP | 309 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Audi TT engine produces 79 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
540 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 61 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 408 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Audi TT has 103 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.24 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 19 200 | 27 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |