Audi TT 2014 vs Ford Mustang 2014

 
Audi TT
2014 - 2018
Ford Mustang
2014 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 230 HP309 HP
Torque: 370 NM407 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Audi TT engine produces 79 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Ford Mustang.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres59 litres
540 km with real consumption530 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.78 m
Width: 1.83 m1.92 m
Height: 1.35 m1.38 m
Audi TT is smaller.
Audi TT is 61 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres408 litres
Ford Mustang has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 103 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 10.96 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.24 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 19 20027 600
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv