Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 6 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi TT) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 6 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 5.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 83 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 260 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 6 sērija 2015 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2015 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 71 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 155 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.74 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 2`315 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`260 kg | 1`795 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 520 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than BMW 6 series. Therefore, BMW 6 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 27 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |