Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi TT) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 80 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW 4 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.34 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |