Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 15 HP less power than BMW 4 series, but torque is 20 NM more than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.34 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`260 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 480 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than BMW 4 series. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |