Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi TT) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 46 HP more power than BMW 4 series, but torque is 10 NM less than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.34 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`260 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 445 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |