Audi TT 2014 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 323 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 93 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 92 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 66 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Audi TT has 59 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |