Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 1 series 2017
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 6 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 1 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.3 | |
|
The BMW 1 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| BMW 1 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 1 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 15 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 1 series (by 488 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`775 kg | 2`005 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`375 kg | 1`455 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 550 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem less than BMW 1 series. Therefore, BMW 1 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |