Audi TT 2014 vs BMW Z4 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi TT) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (BMW Z4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 28 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 110 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW Z4 2013 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW Z4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.29 m | |
| Audi TT is 6 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 125 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi TT scores higher in safety tests, but BMW Z4 is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi TT scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |