Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2015

 
Audi TT
2014 - 2018
BMW 3 series
2015 - 2018
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP190 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 seconds7.3 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 6 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.44.7
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1350 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.35 m1.43 m
Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
712 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7752`110
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20 20022 200
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv