Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 1 series 2017
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 60 NM more than BMW 1 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
|
The BMW 1 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| BMW 1 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 15 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 55 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 1 series (by 488 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`665 kg | 1`915 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`265 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 565 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem less than BMW 1 series. Therefore, BMW 1 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |