Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Audi TT and BMW 4 series have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |