Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2016

 
Audi TT
2014 - 2018
BMW 3 series
2016 - 2018
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP224 HP
Torque: 380 NM450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 seconds6.5 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi TT engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 70 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres57 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
BMW 3 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2016 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.35 m1.43 m
Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
712 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6652`055
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20 20022 200
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv