Audi TT 2018 vs Audi A3 2016

 
Audi TT
2018 - 2023
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 245 HP190 HP
Torque: 370 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 seconds7.2 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 55 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway940 km on highway
560 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.42 m
Width: 1.83 m1.79 m
Height: 1.36 m1.41 m
Audi TT is 23 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data680 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 40 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`965
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv