Audi TT 2018 vs Jaguar F-Type 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Type is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 55 HP less power than Jaguar F-Type, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Type. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Type, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar F-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 28 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 132 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 148 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. The Jaguar F-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 50 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |