Audi TT 2018 vs BMW Z4 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 48 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 13 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 281 litres | |
| Audi TT has 1 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |