Audi TT 2018 vs BMW Z4 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
| Audi TT and BMW Z4 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 13 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 281 litres | |
| Audi TT has 1 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW Z4 has
| |