Audi TT 2018 vs Mercedes C class 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 14 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
| Audi TT is 50 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.22 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |