Audi TT 2018 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Audi TT) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 7 HP more power than BMW 4 series, but torque is 80 NM less than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
| Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`705 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`345 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 360 kg | 520 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem less than BMW 4 series. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |