Audi TT 2018 vs BMW 2 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 13 HP more power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW 2 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 24 cm shorter than the BMW 2 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 390 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |