Audi TT 2016 vs BMW Z4 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 244 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 210 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW Z4 2013 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW Z4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.29 m | |
| Audi TT is 5 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 180 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 125 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.26 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi TT scores higher in safety tests, but BMW Z4 is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi TT scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |