Audi TT 2016 vs BMW 3 series 2015
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 216 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 210 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.43 m | |
| Audi TT is 44 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 480 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.34 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |