Audi TT 2016 vs Audi TT 2018

 
Audi TT
2016 - 2018
Audi TT
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 400 HP245 HP
Torque: 480 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.7 seconds5.2 seconds
Audi TT 2016 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT 2016 engine produces 155 HP more power than Audi TT 2018, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Audi TT 2018. Thanks to more power Audi TT 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.27.0
Real fuel consumption: 11.2 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Audi TT 2018 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT 2016 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2018, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT 2016 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT 2016 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2018.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway840 km on highway
490 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.19 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.34 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi TT 2016 and Audi TT 2018 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres305 litres
Turning diameter: 10.96 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 19 200no data
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv