Audi TT 1999 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler Crossfire can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.0 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.32 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi TT is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Crossfire, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 105 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 190 litres | |
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 115 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. The Chrysler Crossfire may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`695 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
| |