Audi TT 1999 vs BMW Z4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 150 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | 5.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.0 | 7.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 5 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 260 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 80 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`567 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |