Audi TT 1999 vs BMW Z3 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Audi TT 1999 - 2006	BMW Z3 1996 - 2003
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	Rear wheel drive (RWD)
	Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z3 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines:	1.8 - 3.2	1.8 - 3.0
Performance
Power:	150 - 250 HP	115 - 231 HP
Torque:	210 - 320 NM	168 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.4 - 8.9 seconds	6 - 10.5 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.2 - 11.0	7.8 - 10.6
	On average, the Audi TT petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.04 m	4.04 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.73 m
Height:	1.35 m	1.29 m
	Audi TT and BMW Z3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	220 litres	165 litres
	Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 55 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z3.
Turning diameter:	10 meters	10 meters
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`737	~ 1`501

Safety:		no data
Quality:	above average	above average
Average price (€):	5200	6400
Pros and Cons:	Audi TT has available with 4x4 drive roomier boot fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Performance