Audi TT 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 200 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | 6.9 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.0 | 6.3 - 10.0 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
| Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 300 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`998 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |