Audi TT 1999 vs Audi TT 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT 2010 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 160 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 250 - 465 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.0 | 5.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Audi TT 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi TT 1999 is smaller. Audi TT 1999 is 15 cm shorter than the Audi TT 2010, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT 2010 has more luggage space. Audi TT 1999 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 1999 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi TT 2010, which means Audi TT 1999 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | ~ 1`712 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |