Audi TT 2010 vs Volvo S60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Body: CabrioSedan
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 160 - 360 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 250 - 465 NM220 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 7.7 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
In general, Audi TT are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo S60. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 9.53.7 - 9.9
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.63 m
Width: 1.84 m1.87 m
Height: 1.36 m1.48 m
Audi TT is smaller.
Audi TT is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
700 litres1749 litres
Volvo S60 has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 1049 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`712 kg~ 2`087 kg
Net weight:~ 1`362 kg~ 1`613 kg
Load capacity:~ 350 kg~ 474 kg
Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Volvo S60. Therefore, Volvo S60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): no data9000
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • fewer faults
Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv