Audi TT 2010 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 360 HP | 122 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 465 NM | 200 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.5 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.44 m | |
Audi TT is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 205 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The Volkswagen EOS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`712 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |