Audi TT 2010 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Volkswagen EOS
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 160 - 360 HP122 - 210 HP
Torque: 250 - 465 NM200 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 7.7 seconds7.8 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 9.54.8 - 7.5
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.42 m
Width: 1.84 m1.79 m
Height: 1.36 m1.44 m
Audi TT is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data380 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The Volkswagen EOS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`712~ 1`978
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): no data11 600
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen EOS has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv