Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda MX-5 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 360 HP | 126 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 465 NM | 167 - 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, Audi TT are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda MX-5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.5 | 7.0 - 8.0 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.26 m | |
| Audi TT is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
700 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda MX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`712 kg | ~ 1`375 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`362 kg | ~ 1`088 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 350 kg | ~ 287 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Mazda MX-5. Therefore, Audi TT is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |