Audi TT 2010 vs BMW Z4 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
BMW Z4
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 160 - 360 HP184 - 340 HP
Torque: 250 - 465 NM250 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 7.7 seconds4.8 - 7.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 9.56.8 - 9.0
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.24 m
Width: 1.84 m1.79 m
Height: 1.36 m1.29 m
Audi TT is 5 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres180 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data310 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`712~ 1`767
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): no data18 600
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
BMW Z4 has
  • only petrol engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv