Audi TT 2010 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT 2010 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 360 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 465 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.5 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
|
Audi TT 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi TT 2010 is larger. Audi TT 2010 is 15 cm longer than the Audi TT 1999, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Audi TT 2010 has more luggage capacity. Audi TT 2010 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT 1999. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 2010 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Audi TT 1999, which means Audi TT 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`712 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |