Audi TT 1998 vs Audi A3 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | 1.4 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi A3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 102 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 8.6 seconds | 6.3 - 13.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.0 | 5.1 - 10.6 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
Audi TT is 25 cm shorter than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`748 | ~ 1`944 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi A3 has
| |