Audi TT 1998 vs Audi A3 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Audi TT 1998 - 2006	Audi A3 2004 - 2008
Body:	Coupe	Hatchback
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	1.8 - 3.2 (petrol)	1.4 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)
Performance
Power:	150 - 250 HP	102 - 250 HP
Torque:	210 - 320 NM	148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.2 - 8.6 seconds	6.3 - 13.2 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.1 - 11.0	5.1 - 10.6
	Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.04 m	4.29 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.76 m
Height:	1.35 m	1.42 m
	Audi TT is 25 cm shorter than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	270 litres	370 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1120 litres
	Audi A3 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter:	10 meters	10.7 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`748	~ 1`944

Safety:		no data
Quality:	above average	above average
Average price (€):	4400	3200
Pros and Cons:	Audi TT has only petrol engines available better manoeuvrability fewer faults	Audi A3 has petrol and diesel engines available lower fuel consumption for petrol engines roomier boot lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi TT 1998 vs Audi A3 2004

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions