Audi TT 1998 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi TT is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 250 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 320 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 8.6 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.0 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.32 m | |
| Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`748 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |