Audi TT 2010 vs Mercedes C class 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 340 HP | 156 - 457 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 450 NM | 250 - 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 - 7.5 seconds | 4.5 - 9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.2 | 4.4 - 12.0 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
Audi TT is 40 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 450 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Audi TT has 158 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`755 | ~ 2`074 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 26 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |