Audi TT 2010 vs Audi TT 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 340 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 450 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 - 7.5 seconds | 6.2 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.2 | 8.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Audi TT 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi TT 2010 is larger. Audi TT 2010 is 15 cm longer than the Audi TT 1998, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Audi TT 2010 has more luggage capacity. Audi TT 2010 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 2010 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Audi TT 1998, which means Audi TT 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`755 | ~ 1`748 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |