Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 4 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 400 HP | 150 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 480 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 7.1 seconds | 4.8 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.2 | 4.6 - 7.9 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 4 series. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the BMW 4 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 140 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`693 kg | ~ 2`051 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`272 kg | ~ 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 421 kg | ~ 506 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than BMW 4 series. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |