Audi TT 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 400 HP | 116 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 480 NM | 220 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 7.1 seconds | 4.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
| In general, Audi TT are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW 3 series. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.2 | 4.4 - 7.3 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Audi TT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.43 m | |
| Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`693 kg | ~ 2`064 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`272 kg | ~ 1`505 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 421 kg | ~ 559 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than BMW 3 series. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |