Audi TT 2014 vs Audi S3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2014 - 2018
Audi S3
2016 -
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi S3 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0

Performance

Power: 230 - 400 HP310 HP
Torque: 370 - 480 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.7 - 6 seconds4.6 - 5.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 8.26.5 - 7.0
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi S3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.32 m
Width: 1.83 m1.79 m
Height: 1.35 m1.40 m
Audi TT is 14 cm shorter than the Audi S3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 305 litres340 litres
Audi S3 has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 35 litres less trunk space than the Audi S3.
Turning diameter: 10.96 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.06 metres more than that of the Audi S3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`735~ 2`008
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 19 200no data
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • also available in 2WD
Audi S3 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv