Audi TT 2014 vs Audi S3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi S3 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 400 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 480 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.7 - 7.1 seconds | 4.6 - 5.3 seconds | |
| In general, Audi S3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi TT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.2 | 6.5 - 7.0 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi S3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 14 cm shorter than the Audi S3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | 1060 litres | |
|
Audi S3 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 35 litres less trunk space than the Audi S3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi S3 (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi S3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`693 kg | ~ 2`008 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`272 kg | ~ 1`418 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 421 kg | ~ 590 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem less than Audi S3. Therefore, Audi S3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi S3 has
| |