Audi TT 2018 vs BMW Z4 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 - 245 HP | 197 - 340 HP | |
Torque: | 320 - 370 NM | 320 - 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 6.9 seconds | 4.5 - 6.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 7.3 | 6.1 - 7.4 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 13 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 281 litres | |
Audi TT has 1 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`738 | ~ 1`785 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
| |