Audi TT 2018 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 245 HP | 156 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 370 NM | 250 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.6 seconds | 4 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.0 | 4.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
| Audi TT is 50 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Audi TT has 175 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.22 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`728 | ~ 2`089 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |