Audi TT 2018 vs Jaguar F-Type 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 245 HP | 340 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 370 NM | 450 - 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.6 seconds | 4.1 - 5.7 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar F-Type are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi TT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.0 | 8.4 - 11.3 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 408 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`728 kg | ~ 2`075 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`368 kg | ~ 1`568 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 360 kg | ~ 507 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem less than Jaguar F-Type. Therefore, Jaguar F-Type is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |