Audi TT 2018 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler Crossfire can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 245 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 370 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 6.6 seconds | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.0 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 13 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 105 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 190 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 200 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`728 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
| |