Audi TT 2014 vs Jaguar F-Type 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi TT also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 - 5.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi TT is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 230 HP | 340 - 575 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 450 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 7.3 seconds | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar F-Type are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi TT. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.5 | 8.1 - 11.3 | |
|
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but higher. Audi TT is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 196 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar F-Type may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`671 kg | ~ 2`064 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`353 kg | ~ 1`655 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 318 kg | ~ 409 kg | |
| Audi TT load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Jaguar F-Type. Therefore, Jaguar F-Type is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 35 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |