Audi TT 2014 vs BMW Z4 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 - 230 HP | 156 - 306 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 370 NM | 270 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 7.3 seconds | 5.1 - 8.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.5 | 6.8 - 9.4 | |
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.29 m | |
Audi TT is 6 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 180 litres | |
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.26 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`646 | ~ 1`765 | |
Safety: | |||
Audi TT scores higher in safety tests, but BMW Z4 is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi TT scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 23 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |